Review committees

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two committees have been set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance. Additional panels will be set up as needed.

– See more at: http://www.progressivemsalliance.org/about-us/committees/#sthash.mUHR9fOn.dpuf

Scientific Review Committees

The Scientific Review Committees comprise staff and volunteer scientific experts in the field that is the subject of the funding focus, as well as volunteers with MS. They review proposals submitted to the Alliance and identify the ones with the highest scientific merit and alignment with Alliance priorities. These committees are accountable to the Scientific Steering Committee.

Initially, two review committees were set up to review the first request for applications issued by the Alliance in September 2013. Additional panels will be set up as needed.


Basic Science Committee

The Basic Science Committee, which has 20 members from seven countries, reviewed 90 applications for the Challenge and Infrastructure Awards. Its members are:

CHAIR: Raj Kapoor UK
CO-CHAIR: Marco Salvetti Italy

  • Jack Antel Canada
  • David Baker UK
  • Sergio Baranzini USA
  • Tika Benveniste USA
  • Wolfgang Bruck Germany
  • Olga Ciccarelli UK
  • Robin Franklin UK
  • Susan Goelz USA
  • Peter Goodfellow UK
  • Jeroen Guerts Netherlands
  • Reinhard Hohlfeld Germany
  • Catherine Lubetzki France
  • Gianluigi Mancardi Italy
  • Gianvito Martino Italy
  • Trevor Owens Canada
  • Diane Playford UK
  • Peter Stys Canada
  • Bruce Trapp USA

STAFF LEAD: Karen Lee MS Society of Canada


Clinical Science Committee

The Clinical Science Committee, which has 21 members from nine countries, reviewed 105 applications for the Challenge and Infrastructure Awards. Its members are:

CHAIR: Robert Fox USA
CO-CHAIR: Anthony Feinstein Canada

  • Maria Amato Italy
  • Frederick Barkhof Netherlands
  • Manuel Comabella Spain
  • Jorge Correale Argentina
  • Bruce Cree, USA
  • Gary Cutter USA
  • Mark Freedman Canada
  • Ralf Gold Germany
  • Clive Hawkins UK
  • Christoph Heesen Germany
  • Matilde Inglese USA
  • Xavier Montalbann Spain
  • Anne-Louise Ponsonby Australia
  • Kenneth Smith UK
  • Per Sorenson Denmark
  • Maria Pia Sormani Italy
  • Antony Traboulsee Canada
  • Kathleen Zackowski USA
  • Fraucke Zipp Germany

STAFF LEAD: Paola Zaratin Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (Italy)

Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (Italy)
Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (Italy)
Find out about the Challenge Awards

Sign up to our e-newsletter
for updates from our growing global initiative to end progressive MS